高级检索

空气驱油可燃气体爆炸安全风险分析

Safety risk analysis of air flooding oil combustible gas explosion

  • 摘要:
    目的  目前,安全问题仍然是限制空气驱大规模应用的主要原因,为此进行了针对其爆炸极限计算方法的研究。
    方法  通过对6种可燃气体的单组分计算方法、单组分文献值与2种多组分计算方法进行组合,得到了14种计算组合,将其与国内某油田3口井的爆炸实测值进行比较,以判断哪种组合适应性最好。
    结果  含碳原子单组分燃气计算法与多组分燃气计算中查图-理·查特里修正法组合得到的计算结果整体误差相对较小,更符合爆炸极限实测值。
    结论  可为C1~C3轻烃体积分数达90%以上的井流物的爆炸极限理论计算方法的选择提供参考。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  At present, the safety issue is still the primary reason limiting the large-scale application of air flooding. Therefore, the calculation method of the explosion limit of air flooding was used in this study.
    Methods  Through the combination of the component calculation method of six kinds of combustible gases, literature value of single component gases and two kinds of multi-component calculation method, fourteen kinds of calculation combinations have been obtained. The calculation results of various combinations have been subsequently compared with the explosion-measured values of three wells in a domestic oilfield to determine which combination has the best adaptability.
    Results  The overall error of the calculation results obtained by combining the carbon atom single component method and checking the figure-Le Chatlier method was relatively good, which was more consistent with the measured value of explosion limit.
    Conclusion  This study provides a reference for selecting theoretical calculation methods for the well fluid gas explosion limit with the volume fraction of C1-C3 light hydrocarbon content of more than 90%.

     

/

返回文章
返回